<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

  <channel>
    <title>Backup Brain</title>
    <link>http://www.backupbrain.com/</link>
    <description>Backup Brain: Tom Negrino and Dori Smith on technology, culture, and politics</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>backupbrain@negrino.com</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2008</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2008-08-07T19:40:49-08:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.15" />
    <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:backupbrain@negrino.com"/>
    <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
    <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
    <sy:updateBase>2000-01-01T12:00+00:00</sy:updateBase>

    <item>
      <title>Happy Birthday to Dori!</title>
      <link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008_08_03_archive.html#a005173</link>
      <description>I&apos;m posting this a little late in the day, but in my defense, I have already called her. Though I&apos;m working far from home tonight, I hope you&apos;ll all join me in wishing Dori a very happy birthday. Yes, I...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5173@http://www.backupbrain.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm posting this a little late in the day, but in my defense, I have already called her. Though I'm working far from home tonight, I hope you'll all join me in wishing Dori a very happy birthday.</p>

<p>Yes, I did get her a present before I left! She opened it and will be curled up on the couch with the cat and the kid, enjoying it this evening. It's the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/ASIN/B000WC39ZO?tag=chalcedonyconsul">United Artists 30-film DVD set</a>. She tells me I'll be successfully avoiding <em>Fiddler on the Roof</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>family</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-08-07T19:40:49-08:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Tom Negrino</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.backupbrain.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/dori/mt-comments2.cgi?entry_id=5173</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Watching her investment?</title>
      <link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008_08_03_archive.html#a005172</link>
      <description>Watching the news reports of the day-by-day campaigning, I noticed something a bit odd. Almost every time you see McCain, you see his wife Cindy with him. She often introduces him. She&apos;s always traveling with him. He recently offered to...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5172@http://www.backupbrain.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching the news reports of the day-by-day campaigning, I noticed something a bit odd. Almost every time you see McCain, you see his wife Cindy with him. She often introduces him. She's always traveling with him. He recently offered to have her pose topless (OK, she's attractive for her age, but she's also 54; isn't that a bit old for that sort of career change?). I can't remember the last time you saw a candidate with his wife attached to him at the hip like this. Even Bill and Hillary weren't together that much in 1992.</p>

<p>Obama, by contrast, is generally on his own on the road; Michelle shows up for some of his events and does her own events. And of course, she's raising two children.</p>

<p>Nothing is done by mistake on a presidential campaign. Does Cindy travel with her husband to show he has a much younger wife? To keep his famously volcanic temper under control? I don't know the answer, but it does seem a bit weird to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>politics</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-08-06T08:28:36-08:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Tom Negrino</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.backupbrain.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/dori/mt-comments2.cgi?entry_id=5172</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>2008 ALA Web Builder&apos;s Survey</title>
      <link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008_07_27_archive.html#a005171</link>
      <description>You may recall that about 15 months ago, the good folks over at A List Apart did their first survey of web designers, and at the time they promised that they&apos;d do it again. Now, they have. Whether you took...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5171@http://www.backupbrain.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.backupbrain.com/2007_04_29_archive.html"><img src="http://www.backupbrain.com/images/i-took-the-2007-survey.gif" height="45" width="180" alt="took the survey" align="left" hspace="10" /></a>You may recall that about 15 months ago, the good folks over at <a href="http://alistapart.com/">A List Apart</a> did their first survey of web designers, and at the time they promised that they'd do it again.</p>
<p>Now, they have.</p>
<p><a href="http://alistapart.com/articles/survey2008"><img src="http://media.tumblr.com/7ipPDVSLlc05gfeqF4JVauAz_500.gif" height="46" width="180" alt="took the survey" align="left" hspace="10" /></a>Whether you took the 2007 survey or not, whether you're a full-time web designer or not: if you build web sites, you should go take the <a href="http://alistapart.com/articles/survey2008">2008 A List Apart Survey</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-08-02T02:13:32-08:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Dori Smith</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.backupbrain.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/dori/mt-comments2.cgi?entry_id=5171</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ladies, he&apos;s just not into you</title>
      <link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008_07_20_archive.html#a005170</link>
      <description>I&apos;ve been puzzled for months why women are seen as good bets as McCain voters. He has provided many examples of his lack of sympathy towards women and issues that are important to women, including reproductive rights, contraception, pay equity...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5170@http://www.backupbrain.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been puzzled for months why women are seen as good bets as McCain voters. He has provided many examples of his lack of sympathy towards women and issues that are important to women, including reproductive rights, contraception, pay equity and more. This article, <a href="http://www.inthesetimes.com/main/print/3799/">McSexist</a>, has a good roundup of his actual policy positions, which lead Katha Pollitt to say: "[T]o vote for McCain, a feminist would have to be insane."</p>

<p>I hope that some group spends some time and campaign dollars to spread the truth about McCain's terrible record on gender issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>politics</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-07-25T19:48:16-08:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Tom Negrino</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.backupbrain.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/dori/mt-comments2.cgi?entry_id=5170</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>He&apos;s just a bad candidate</title>
      <link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008_07_20_archive.html#a005169</link>
      <description>It&apos;s been interesting seeing how the McCain campaign has been flailing the last few days, while Obama was on his overseas trip. It&apos;s understandable; when the Prime Minister of Iraq undercut McCain&apos;s primary reason for running, and virtually endorsed Obama&apos;s...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5169@http://www.backupbrain.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's been interesting seeing how the McCain campaign has been flailing the last few days, while Obama was on his overseas trip. It's understandable; when the Prime Minister of Iraq undercut McCain's primary reason for running, and virtually endorsed Obama's withdrawal plan, there wasn't much room left to maneuver. </p>

<p>But besides the strategy, there's something else I want to mention. I was at the gym this morning, and CNN was on in the locker room. They were covering a town hall meeting that McCain was doing in New Hampshire. Remember, he thinks that these meetings are his <em>strength</em>; he wanted to do ten of them side-by-side with Obama. Now, I couldn't see the screen from where I was changing my clothes, but I could hear pretty well. And frankly, McCain just isn't good in these things. He took a question, and didn't answer it, instead pivoting to an attack on Obama on a different subject. He made a joke which fell flat. And in the few minutes I was listening, he used the phrases "by the way" three times, and "my friends" or "my dear friends" twice. The first makes him sound like he can't maintain a coherent argument. And the "my friends" stuff just comes off as phony or patronizing at worst and a verbal fart at best.</p>

<p>We've seen that horrible grimace he uses when he's been told to smile and isn't really feeling it. He's fine one-on-one with the press, as long as they are tossing him softballs, and he's gotten a lot of them over the years. But he's simply not up to the task when a reporter <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wqMh0PDZwEE">asks him something outside his comfort zone</a>. And as best I can tell, he just can't connect with people on television. He managed to survive the GOP primaries to become the nominee simply by not giving up when his campaign tanked last year. He didn't have to become a <em>better</em> candidate; he just had to hang in there. But Obama was honed into a much better candidate by Hillary and Edwards and the press over the past year. When it's head-to-head between McCain and Obama, I think McCain will be toast.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>politics</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-07-22T13:08:26-08:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Tom Negrino</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.backupbrain.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/dori/mt-comments2.cgi?entry_id=5169</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dori&apos;s Grand Unified Theory of Women, Girls, Chicks, and Babes</title>
      <link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008_07_13_archive.html#a005168</link>
      <description>Last week, I ended up on an all-female MacJury podcast (not counting the moderator) discussing the Mac market (and otherwise) and how women are marketed to. When that went live, it caused some chatter on Twitter, which then got brought...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5168@http://www.backupbrain.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, I ended up on  <a title="MacJury  » Blog Archive   » MacJury #814: The First All-Female MacJury On the iPhone and How the Mac Market Addresses (or Doesn't) Women" href="http://www.macjury.com/macjury-814-the-first-all-female-macjury-on-the-iphone-and-how-the-mac-market-addresses-or-doesnt-women/">an all-female MacJury podcast</a> (not counting the moderator) discussing the Mac market (and otherwise) and how women are marketed to. When that went live, it caused <a href="http://search.twitter.com/search?q=+%28chick+OR+chicks%29+from%3Adori">some chatter on Twitter</a>, which then got brought up again last night at an excellent dinner and discussion I had with Tom and <a href="http://twitter.com/macgenie">Jean MacDonald</a> of <a href="http://smileonmymac.com/">SmileOnMyMac</a>.</p>
<p>What we all discovered is that we use words like "girl," "chick, and "babe," and we <em>assume</em> that other people have the same definitions for those words that we do&mdash;but that's not a valid assumption, so we end up talking at each other instead of with each other.</p>
<p>So, I promised that I'd give my definitions, and it ended up just being simpler to make it a chart:</p>
<p><img alt="babeChart.jpg" src="/images/babeChart.jpg" width="520" height="630" /></p>
<p>Let me know what you think in the comments, please!</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-07-18T21:55:39-08:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Dori Smith</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.backupbrain.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/dori/mt-comments2.cgi?entry_id=5168</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Apple&apos;s Problem, My Solution</title>
      <link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008_07_06_archive.html#a005167</link>
      <description><![CDATA[When reviewers look at software, it's standard that they use what's called an "NFR"&mdash;a "Not For Resale" copy of the application, given to them free by the developer (or by the media outlet for whom they're writing). The problem now:...]]></description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5167@http://www.backupbrain.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When reviewers look at software, it's standard that they use what's called an "NFR"&mdash;a "Not For Resale" copy of the application, given to them free by the developer (or by the media outlet for whom they're writing).</p>
<p>The problem now: there's no way for iPhone app developers to give out NFR copies of their apps&mdash;Apple makes them state a price, and then that's the price that gets charged in the App Store. As <a href="http://twitter.com/Ihnatko/statuses/856155797">Andy Ihnatko tweeted</a> yesterday,</p>
<blockquote><p>Already I need to stop and work out a policy for free evals of iPhone apps. Devs sending me $X iTunes gift certificates is bad on many levls</p></blockquote>
<p>My answer: given that you can go to the iTunes store and <a href="http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=302534">give someone a song, album, or movie</a>, you should be able to give someone an application in the same fashion. Apple knows who put the application into the store; that same person ought to be able to send out (a limited number of?) freebies. It's a benefit to developers, to reviewers, and in the long run, to Apple as well.</p>
<p>And no, we have no iPhones (3G or otherwise) here, so this hasn't been an issue for us. Although if anyone wants to send me something that will work with my iPod Touch&hellip;</p>

]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>technology</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-07-12T21:56:03-08:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Dori Smith</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.backupbrain.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/dori/mt-comments2.cgi?entry_id=5167</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Attention, Obama worshippers</title>
      <link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008_06_29_archive.html#a005166</link>
      <description>I went to one of the Obama Unite for Change events last weekend. Rather than go to the one here in our small town, I went to the bigger one down in Santa Rosa. It was a good event, run...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5166@http://www.backupbrain.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to one of the Obama Unite for Change events last weekend. Rather than go to the one here in our small town, I went to the bigger one <a href="http://www1.pressdemocrat.com/article/20080629/NEWS/806290437">down in Santa Rosa</a>. It was a good event, run well, which is one of the things I was looking to see. The campaign was selling the usual swag: lawn signs, buttons, bumper stickers (bought one of those for each of our cars). They were also selling T-shirts, which I noticed had something a little unusual: besides the logo, it had a picture of the candidate. From the last cycle, I don't remember Dean shirts, or Kerry shirts, or Bush shirts that had the candidate's face. And I don't remember seeing that in the primaries this time, either.</p>

<p>In conversation with some of the other attendees, I was struck by how much some of them seemed to have invested in Obama <em>personally</em>; one guy gushed that he thought that Obama would "heal the racial divide in this country." Another woman professed her love for Obama in a way that I thought was borderline creepy.</p>

<p>The Obama campaign is smart; they've purposely worked on making their guy an icon. But some of his supporters are just a bit out of whack. Which brings me to how many on the left are freaking out now that the primaries are over and Obama has started tacking to the center.</p>

<p>Really, what were they thinking he would do? Obama wants to <em>win</em>. He's a politician who will do whatever it takes. Personally, I absolutely want that from a Democratic candidate. If, in the middle of one of the debates, Obama stands up, emits a bloodcurdling scream, opens his mouth larger than humanly possible, and <em>eats John McCain's head</em>, I will applaud our new demon master.</p>

<p>In the meantime, some of his strategic moves make me roll my eyes, like his sop to the superstitious yesterday. But that's politics. No doubt we'll see more of that.</p>

<p>To the lefties that have taken to the fainting couch about those moves, I heartily recommend that they read <a href="http://scalzi.com/whatever/?p=966">this post</a> from John Scalzi.</p>



]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>politics</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-07-02T22:18:29-08:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Tom Negrino</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.backupbrain.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/dori/mt-comments2.cgi?entry_id=5166</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>I know who I trust. It&apos;s Wes Clark.</title>
      <link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008_06_29_archive.html#a005165</link>
      <description>We all have to gauge the national security qualifications of the two candidates for president. I have no experience there, so I look to people better schooled in that area than I am for their opinions. John McCain was fifth...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5165@http://www.backupbrain.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all have to gauge the national security qualifications of the two candidates for president. I have no experience there, so I look to people better schooled in that area than I am for their opinions. </p>

<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_McCain">John McCain</a> was fifth from the bottom of his class at Annapolis. He's admitted that he was constantly having problems with discipline and authority. I would normally applaud that, <em>but he was in the Navy</em>. After Annapolis, he crashed two planes, and ran another into some power lines. This is a picture of a mediocre pilot, not some hotshot. He went to Vietnam, was shot down and became a POW for six years, during which he suffered from torture by his captors. Upon his return and physical rehabilitation, he commanded a Florida training squadron.</p>

<p>He was never offered a significant sea command, which led to him retiring from the Navy as a captain. So it appears that aside from his POW experience, John McCain was not an exceptional or especially well regarded Naval officer. I presume that those Navy promotion boards knew what they were doing.</p>

<p>When <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wesley_Clark">Wesley Clark</a>, West Point valedictorian, Rhodes Scholar, four-star general, and Supreme Allied Commander of NATO, says this about John McCain:</p>

<blockquote>John McCain is running his campaign on his experience and how his experience would benefit him and our nation as President. That experience shows courage and commitment to our country - but it doesn't include executive experience wrestling with national policy or go-to-war decisions. And in this area his judgment has been flawed - he not only supported going into a war we didn't have to fight in Iraq, but has time and again undervalued other, non-military elements of national power that must be used effectively to protect America. But as an American and former military officer I will not back down if I believe someone doesn't have sound judgment when it comes to our nation's most critical issues.</blockquote>

<p>...I'm going to believe Clark's assessment. Clark is making a judgment about McCain's experience and fitness to be President, based on his (Clark's) superior knowledge of the national security arena. I think that Clark is far better qualified to make that judgment than I am, and far better qualified than virtually all of the weenies on the right <em>and</em> the left that are criticizing him for daring to tell a hard truth about the Sainted McCain.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>politics</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-06-30T22:57:29-08:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Tom Negrino</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.backupbrain.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/dori/mt-comments2.cgi?entry_id=5165</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Free Photoshop Alternatives</title>
      <link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008_06_22_archive.html#a005164</link>
      <description>Looking for an image editor that is cheap, reasonably useful, cheap, packed with features, cheap, easier to learn and use than Photoshop, cheap, and not cluttered up with all those Photoshop features that you don&apos;t need because you&apos;re not a...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5164@http://www.backupbrain.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking for an image editor that is cheap, reasonably useful, cheap, packed with features, cheap, easier to learn and use than Photoshop, cheap, and not cluttered up with all those Photoshop features that you don't need because you're not a graphic artist? And also, cheap? If so, check out <a href="http://www.lifeclever.com/10-free-web-based-alternatives-to-photoshop/">10 Free Web-based Alternatives to Photoshop</a> (h/t Paul Music).</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>technology</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-06-22T17:13:58-08:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Tom Negrino</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.backupbrain.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/dori/mt-comments2.cgi?entry_id=5164</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>So You Wanna Write a Tech Book?</title>
      <link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008_06_15_archive.html#a005163</link>
      <description>Both Shelley and Simon pointed to Baron Schwartz&apos;s What is it like to write a technical book?, so I thought I&apos;d check it out. It&apos;s interesting reading, as is the complementary piece by Andy Oram (his editor), O&apos;Reilly Author and...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5163@http://www.backupbrain.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both <a title="The Life of a Tech Book Writer | Burningbird's RealTech" href="http://realtech.burningbird.net/the-life-a-tech-book-writer" title="The Life of a Tech Book Writer | Burningbird's RealTech">Shelley</a> and <a href="http://simonwillison.net/2008/Jun/20/like/" title="What is it like to write a technical book?">Simon</a> pointed to Baron Schwartz's <a href="http://www.xaprb.com/blog/2008/06/15/what-is-it-like-to-write-a-technical-book/">What is it like to write a technical book?</a>, so I thought I'd check it out. It's interesting reading, as is the complementary piece by Andy Oram (his editor), <a href="http://toc.oreilly.com/2008/06/oreilly-author-and-editor-air.html">O'Reilly Author and Editor Air Concerns on Industry Pressures</a>.</p>
<p>A big problem I have with these sort of blog posts, though, is that too many of them (John Resig's <a href="http://ejohn.org/blog/programming-book-profits/">Programming Book Profits</a> as another) are written after one book, or one editor, or one publishing company. Not all books, topics, publishers, editors, etc. are created equal, and you really can't extrapolate anything meaningful from a single data point.</p>
<p>Now, I'm thinking about pitching a session for <a href="http://2008.sxsw.com/interactive/programming/panel_picker/faq/">2009 SxSW</a>: "So You Wanna Write A Book?"</p>
<p>I need to know: if there is such a panel, would you want to attend? And if so, who would you want to see on the panel?</p>
<p>One issue I have is that I know <em>so</em> many people who really ought to be on this panel (me as moderator, for one!). Just as an off the top of my head list in no particular order, and limiting it to people I've seen attend SxSW before, here's who I'd love to have: John Resig, Wendy Sharp, Michael Nolan, Simon St. Laurent, Kathy Sierra, Stephanie Sullivan, Virginia DeBolt, Julie Melton, and Christian Crumlish. Others I haven't seen at SxSW, but would want to have on for their particular points of view: Adam or Tonya Engst and Laura Lemay. And then there's the people I've never met, but who I think would be valuable contributors such as Adam Greenfield. And I could go on and on and&hellip;</p>
<p>So? Let me know what you think in the comments.</p>
<p>[and in case you're wondering about <em>my</em> qualifications to moderate this panel: I've been a tech book author for over ten years. I'm one of the very few people around who actually lives off their tech book writing. I've written for multiple editors and multiple publishers. I've had books <a href="http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2008/03/state-of-the-computer-book-mar-23.html" title="Code books ranked by sales">that were hugely successful</a>, books that were moderately successful, and one book that tanked&mdash;so I can speak to a little of everything.]</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-06-21T19:18:29-08:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Dori Smith</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.backupbrain.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/dori/mt-comments2.cgi?entry_id=5163</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Spot the Geek</title>
      <link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008_06_08_archive.html#a005162</link>
      <description>Can you spot the geek in this picture?...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5162@http://www.backupbrain.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you spot the geek in this picture?</p>
<a href="http://crown.ucsc.edu/studentlife/css.php"><img src="http://crown.ucsc.edu/studentlife/img/css0708.jpg" width="565" height="286" alt="Crown student senate" /></a>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>family</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-06-13T11:27:20-08:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Dori Smith</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.backupbrain.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/dori/mt-comments2.cgi?entry_id=5162</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Amazon Bookmarklet Update</title>
      <link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008_06_08_archive.html#a005161</link>
      <description>A year or two ago, I wrote a post here titled Amazon credit where it&apos;s due, in which I passed along how to personalize and install an Amazon affiliate link bookmarklet. I got an email today (thanks, Jamie!) telling me...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5161@http://www.backupbrain.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A year or two ago, I wrote a post here titled <a title="Amazon credit where it's due" href="http://www.backupbrain.com/2006_12_18.html">Amazon credit where it's due</a>, in which I passed along how to personalize and install an Amazon affiliate link bookmarklet.</p>
<p>I got an email today (thanks, Jamie!) telling me that Amazon has a new link format, and asking if I could please update the bookmarklet? Sure&mdash;no problem. Here you go:</p>
<p><a href="javascript:myCode='chalcedonyconsul';myAsin=(asin)?asin:(productTags)?productTags.asin:(document.getElementById('ASIN'))?document.getElementById('ASIN').value:'';if(myAsin==''){alert('Sorry,%20couldn\'t%20find%20the%20ASIN')}else{document.location='http://www.amazon.com/dp/ASIN/'+myAsin+'?tag='+myCode;}">Amazon Credit</a></p>
<p>To repeat what I said last time:</p><blockquote>
<p>To install: drag that link to your bookmark/favorites bar.</p> 
<p>To use: find the item you want on Amazon. When you're on the item page, click the bookmarklet, and the page should reload, giving the friend credit for the recommendation. That's all there is to it.</p> 
<p>If you have a problem with this bookmarklet, just let me know. It'll be easier for me to fix, though, if you give me as much information as possible (your browser/version, your OS, what item you were looking at, what you expected to happen, what did happen, etc.).</p> 
<p>Want to provide this bookmarklet to others, personalized for your blog? See where the code starts with <tt>myCode='chalcedonyconsul'</tt>? Just change the value in quotes to be your associate ID instead, and place the bookmarklet (the whole thing, not just that snippet!) as a link on your blog with these same instructions (a link back to here would be appreciated as well).</p></blockquote>
<p>Enjoy!</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-06-10T18:46:32-08:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Dori Smith</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.backupbrain.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/dori/mt-comments2.cgi?entry_id=5161</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The verdict is in</title>
      <link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008_06_01_archive.html#a005160</link>
      <description>I appeared on this week&apos;s MacJury, hosted by Chuck Joiner and with three other Mac pundits. It was my second appearance, and it was as fun as the first; I had a great time. This session was devoted to pre-WWDC...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5160@http://www.backupbrain.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appeared on this week's MacJury, hosted by Chuck Joiner and with three other Mac pundits. It was my second appearance, and it was as fun as the first; I had a great time. This session was devoted to pre-WWDC speculation and desires, though we tried to stay out of the rumor realm. It's about an hour, and you can find it <a href="http://www.macjury.com/macjury-811-wwdc-preview-iphone-speculation-apple-tv-wishes-and-mac-os-expectations/">right here.</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>technology</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-06-05T12:29:05-08:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Tom Negrino</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.backupbrain.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/dori/mt-comments2.cgi?entry_id=5160</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The end of the death march</title>
      <link>http://www.backupbrain.com/2008_05_25_archive.html#a005159</link>
      <description>Let me just say how happy I am that the Democratic primary season is nearly over. With the Democratic rule committee meting today, the last major problem - the disposition of the Florida and Michigan rogue primaries - has been...</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">5159@http://www.backupbrain.com/</guid>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me just say how <em>happy</em> I am that the Democratic primary season is nearly over. With the Democratic rule committee meting today, the last major problem - the disposition of the Florida and Michigan rogue primaries - has been solved. Things haven't changed since yesterday, of course; Obama has still won, and Hillary's still lost. But now one more fig leaf has been removed from the Clinton camp, and the last real obstacle to Obama's assuming the mantle is gone. I expect that come Wednesday or Thursday of next week, after the last couple of primaries, remaining "uncommitted" superdelegates will come out for Obama, and he can turn full-steam to the real job: kicking <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2007-02-19-mccain-roe_x.htm">John McCain's</a> electoral ass.</p>]]></content:encoded>
      <dc:subject>politics</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-05-31T20:50:23-08:00</dc:date>
      <dc:creator>Tom Negrino</dc:creator>
      <comments>http://www.backupbrain.com/cgi-sys/cgiwrap/dori/mt-comments2.cgi?entry_id=5159</comments>
    </item>


  </channel>
</rss>

